We’ve all seen it. A godly leader is doing what’s right — leading with integrity, making an impact for God’s glory. And then, someone attacks their character.

Not their methods. Not their vision. The leader himself.

The slander isn’t just frustrating — it’s personal. And worse, it’s not even true. But still, it spreads.

When this happens, we’re tempted to respond in all sorts of ways. We get defensive. We want to stand up for a friend. Sometimes, we feel the urge to jump online and set the record straight — or give someone a piece of our mind. But those responses almost never help.

Oswald Sanders wisely said, “No leader lives a day without criticism…” (Spiritual Leadership, p. 145). Often, that criticism isn’t fair.

Nehemiah faced that kind of slander. Throughout his mission to rebuild Jerusalem’s walls, he faced intense opposition from two men: Sanballat and Tobiah. They were outside the city, but they believed they should have influence inside the city. They operated from the outside while wanting to control what happened inside. So they tried every trick in the book: intimidation, rumors, manipulation, recruiting insiders, political games, and even threats of violence.

But by Nehemiah 6, their schemes had largely failed. The wall was built — only the gates needed their doors. And as Sanballat and Tobiah saw the metaphorical and literal door closing on their efforts, they got desperate. With the end in sight and their influence slipping, they pulled one final card: slander.

They threatened to report Nehemiah to the king and gave him a preview of the message:

“Wherein was written, It is reported among the heathen, and Gashmu saith it, that thou and the Jews think to rebel: for which cause thou buildest the wall, that thou mayest be their king, according to these words. And thou hast also appointed prophets to preach of thee at Jerusalem, saying, There is a king in Judah: and now shall it be reported to the king according to these words. Come now therefore, and let us take counsel together.” 

Nehemiah 6:6-7

They accused Nehemiah of trying to establish a rival kingdom. They claimed he had recruited prophets to crown him king. It was a complete fabrication — no receipts, no proof. Just bold-faced lies from men trying to manipulate the situation with fear. But they tried to hold him hostage with their lies: “Meet with us, or we’re sending this to the king.”

This still happens today. Our world is full of modern-day Sanballats and Tobiahs. They live online, in churches, and in parachurch ministries. People who overstep their boundaries. People who meddle in stewardships that don’t belong to them. They claim insider information, make baseless accusations, and claim to be “truth-tellers” with no receipts. Sound familiar?

So how did Nehemiah respond?

In a world where rumors spread like wildfire — across the internet, in the church foyer, on campus, or over coffee — it’s essential to know how to handle slander. Nehemiah gives us a blueprint:

1. Call it what it is.

Nehemiah said simply, “There is no truth to any part of your story. You are making it all up in your head” (Nehemiah 6:8– paraphrased). He didn’t waste time over-explaining. He didn’t defend himself point by point. He didn’t take their bait. He just said: “That’s not true — and you know it. You made it up.” Sometimes the most godly response is a brief and clear denial.

2. See it clearly.

Nehemiah discerned their motive: “They were all trying to frighten us, thinking, ‘Their hands will get too weak for the work, and it will not be completed’” (v. 9). He recognized their goal was to derail God’s work by sowing fear. As leaders, we must not lose sight of the bigger picture. Opposition is often designed to distract and discourage.

3. Pray for strength.

Instead of reacting in the flesh, Nehemiah turned to God and prayed, “Now, O God, strengthen my hands.” Opposition like this often signals that you’re on the right track. Nehemiah didn’t face it alone — he recognized that the work was far too important, and far too large, to accomplish in his own strength.

4. Keep going.

Nehemiah didn’t stop to play political games or chase his accusers down in court. He didn’t let slander stall the mission. The wall still needed doors. The city needed more people. There was more to do — and he wasn’t going to be distracted. He had a job to do. The New Testament urges us to press on toward the mark (Phil. 3:14) and to lay aside every distraction that could entangle us or disqualify us in the race (Heb. 12:1–2). Often, moments of slander come just before God is about to do something great — so don’t let them pull you off course.

Nehemiah could have won the argument. He could have lawyered up, released a detailed rebuttal, or met with his enemies to “clear things up.” But he knew better. It was a trap. It would waste time — and possibly cost him his life. So he didn’t cave. He didn’t get sidetracked. He told the truth. He saw the game. He prayed for strength. He kept building. And God blessed the work tremendously.

There will always be Sanballats and Tobiahs. And the New Testament warns us to steer clear of these kinds of people and conversations (see 1 Timothy 1:4; 6:4-5; 2 Timothy 2:14, 16). Don’t engage them. Don’t entertain them. Stay out of it.

When outsiders try to meddle in a ministry that isn’t theirs, Satan often uses that chaos to divide God’s people. When you feel the urge to clap back, defend your name, or post something “just to set the record straight” — pause. Label them for what they are (modern-day Sanballats and Tobiahs). Then do what Nehemiah did. Don’t trade your stewardship for a shouting match.

Speak the truth. See the situation clearly. Ask God for strength. And keep going.

You’ve got work to do. Steward it with vision, resolve, and trust in the Lord.

“Now, O God, strengthen my hands.” (Nehemiah 6:9)

 

So, Is Orthodoxy Theologically Wrong?

In many of the most important areas, yes.

While Orthodoxy differs from Catholicism in structure and emphasis, it ultimately shares many of the same foundational theological problems.

1. Orthodoxy Rejects Scripture Alone as Final Authority.

Orthodoxy teaches that authority comes from both Scripture and “Holy Tradition.”

While they affirm the inspiration of the Bible, they also teach that Scripture must be interpreted through:

  • Church fathers
  • Ecumenical councils
  • Church liturgy
  • Historical tradition

In practice, this means the church becomes the final interpreter of truth.

That directly conflicts with the sufficiency and clarity of Scripture.

The Bible teaches that Scripture is sufficient to equip the believer for every good work:

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God… that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.” — 2 Timothy 3:16–17

Church history is valuable, but it is not infallible. Scripture alone is God-breathed.

2. Orthodoxy Holds to a Faulty View of Salvation.

This is the biggest issue.

Orthodoxy does not teach justification by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone.

Instead, salvation is viewed as a lifelong process of participation in God through sacraments, repentance, fasting, obedience, and spiritual transformation (“theosis”).

While Orthodoxy rightly emphasizes transformation and sanctification, it confuses sanctification with justification.

The Bible teaches that sinners are declared righteous before God entirely because of Christ’s righteousness credited to them by faith.

Orthodoxy instead blends faith and works into the basis of acceptance before God.

That is not a small disagreement. That is the heart of the Gospel.

3. Orthodoxy Elevates Tradition Beyond Scripture.

Orthodox theology relies heavily on church tradition and historical continuity.

But one of the major problems is inconsistency.

Even within Orthodoxy, there are disagreements over how binding various councils, traditions, and practices actually are.

For example, some historical Orthodox councils strongly defended the veneration of icons—even pronouncing curses on those who rejected them—while modern practice is often softer and less consistent.

This creates an unstable authority structure.

If tradition is infallible, which traditions count? Which councils are binding? Which church fathers are definitive?

Ultimately, Orthodoxy ends up selectively appealing to history in ways that can become inconsistent and subjective.

4. Orthodoxy Contains Serious Doctrinal Problems.

Orthodoxy also teaches doctrines and practices that go beyond Scripture, including:

  • Prayers connected to Mary and the saints
  • Sacramental salvation
  • Veneration of icons
  • Mystical teachings about the afterlife
  • A priestly mediation system

Some Orthodox traditions even teach concepts similar to “toll houses,” where souls are examined after death regarding their sins and spiritual condition before entering God’s presence.

These ideas simply are not grounded in clear biblical teaching.

Is Orthodoxy the same as Catholicism?

No.

There are real differences between Orthodoxy and Catholicism.

Orthodoxy rejects papal supremacy, has a different structure of church authority, and differs on certain doctrinal details.

But despite those differences, both systems ultimately place authority outside Scripture and both reject justification by faith alone.

That means the core Gospel issue remains.

The Real Solution Is Not Formality—It’s Biblical Truth

Many people are running toward Orthodoxy because they correctly recognize problems in modern Christianity:

  • Shallow teaching
  • Consumer-driven worship
  • Emotionalism
  • Casualness toward God

Those concerns are often legitimate.

But the answer is not to run toward a system that adds layers of tradition and obscures the Gospel.

The solution is to return to Scripture.

The Bible is sufficient, clear, authoritative, and enough for the church today.

True reverence does not come from incense, candles, or ancient rituals alone. It comes from rightly seeing God through His Word.

“Let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear.” — Hebrews 12:28

Reverent worship flows from a right understanding of who God is—not merely from atmosphere or formality.

Final Thoughts

Orthodoxy is attractive because it offers history, beauty, transcendence, and seriousness in an age of instability and superficiality.

But sincerity, beauty, and antiquity are not enough.

Every church, tradition, and theological system must ultimately be tested by the Word of God.

And wherever any system departs from the Gospel of grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, we must lovingly but clearly say that it is wrong—no matter how ancient or impressive it may appear.

Resources to Learn More

  • 9 Marks Pastor’s Talk — 2-part episode on Eastern Orthodoxy
  • The Story of Christianity: Volumes 1–2 by Justo L. Gonzalez